This is a guide to help you review an article of the wiki about the system rst_helicaseduf2290.
(If reading from you mail client, you can click on the link with the # above to go to the issue directly)
[If it's slow, wait, it might fail (Time out from you browser), but you'll notice that :8080 has been inserted in the url, just remove it and reload the page. It's faster then to continue browsing from the website directly rather than opening another link, it's a bug we're aware of and we're tracking it]
Please check that all the following criteria are met to consider that a page is complete and correct.
The article is correctly structured. It should contain :
Header with the following fields (please pay attention to block indentation) --> /!\ This is not visible from the webpage, you need to edit it to see this part.
The header contains all the required information. The information provided in the header is required to display the list of defense systems.
The mandatory fields are :
title:
tableColumns:
article:
doi:
abstract:
contributors
relevantAbstract
Optional fields are :
Sensor
Activator
Effector
PFAM
The following paragraphs are in the correct order
Description
Molecular mechanisms
Example of genomic structure
Distribution of the system among prokaryotes
Structure (a plugin)
Experimental validation (a graph)
Relevant Abstract (Automatic)
References (Automatic)
Main title is correct. For a defense system, it should simply be the name of the system.
All the information is provided, correct and understandable. Rule of thumb : As a newcommer in the field, does the page provide the essential information in a clear way regarding the system ?
Short description of the system
Composition of the system
Mechanism of action if it is known
References to the literature to further explore the defense system,
inline references should have the following syntax : :ref{doi=my-doi}.
Distribution of the system among prokaryotes
Structure display
At least one relevant abstract is provided. (see frontmatter)
Old syntax is removed, eg:
There should not be any section ## Relevant abstract (with items and doi below), it's now automatic
Reference in the text shouldn't be (1) or (Toto et al) but :ref{doi=my-doi} It will be automatically replaced
You can create a Merge request at any time and continue working on it later
In your MR message, link it to this issue #271 (closed)
Read more
✓
15 of 15 checklist items completed
· Edited by
emordret
00
Child items
0
More actions
Show labels
Show closed items
No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down work into smaller parts.
emordretmarked the checklist item The article is correctly structured. It should contain : as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item The header contains all the required information. The information provided in the header is required to display the list of defense systems. as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Main title is correct. For a defense system, it should simply be the name of the system. as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item All the information is provided, correct and understandable. Rule of thumb : As a newcommer in the field, does the page provide the essential information in a clear way regarding the system ? as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Short description of the system as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Composition of the system as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Mechanism of action if it is known as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item References to the literature to further explore the defense system, as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item inline references should have the following syntax : :ref{doi=my-doi}. as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Distribution of the system among prokaryotes as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Structure display as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item At least one relevant abstract is provided. (see frontmatter) as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Old syntax is removed, eg: as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item There should not be any section ## Relevant abstract (with items and doi below), it's now automatic as completed
emordretmarked the checklist item Reference in the text shouldn't be (1) or (Toto et al) but :ref{doi=my-doi} It will be automatically replaced as completed