Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Update butters_gp30_gp31.md

Merged hshomar requested to merge hshomar-main-patch-55542 into main
All threads resolved!
@@ -6,11 +6,35 @@ tableColumns:
@@ -6,11 +6,35 @@ tableColumns:
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00534-20
doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00534-20
abstract: |
abstract: |
Many sequenced bacterial genomes, including those of pathogenic bacteria, contain prophages. Some prophages encode defense systems that protect their bacterial host against heterotypic viral attack. Understanding the mechanisms undergirding these defense systems is crucial to appreciate the scope of bacterial immunity against viral infections and will be critical for better implementation of phage therapy that would require evasion of these defenses. Furthermore, such knowledge of prophage-encoded defense mechanisms may be useful for developing novel genetic tools for engineering phage-resistant bacteria of industrial importance., A diverse set of prophage-mediated mechanisms protecting bacterial hosts from infection has been recently uncovered within cluster N mycobacteriophages isolated on the host, Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155. In that context, we unveil a novel defense mechanism in cluster N prophage Butters. By using bioinformatics analyses, phage plating efficiency experiments, microscopy, and immunoprecipitation assays, we show that Butters genes located in the central region of the genome play a key role in the defense against heterotypic viral attack. Our study suggests that a two-component system, articulated by interactions between protein products of genes 30 and 31, confers defense against heterotypic phage infection by PurpleHaze (cluster A/subcluster A3) or Alma (cluster A/subcluster A9) but is insufficient to confer defense against attack by the heterotypic phage Island3 (cluster I/subcluster I1). Therefore, based on heterotypic phage plating efficiencies on the Butters lysogen, additional prophage genes required for defense are implicated and further show specificity of prophage-encoded defense systems., IMPORTANCE Many sequenced bacterial genomes, including those of pathogenic bacteria, contain prophages. Some prophages encode defense systems that protect their bacterial host against heterotypic viral attack. Understanding the mechanisms undergirding these defense systems is crucial to appreciate the scope of bacterial immunity against viral infections and will be critical for better implementation of phage therapy that would require evasion of these defenses. Furthermore, such knowledge of prophage-encoded defense mechanisms may be useful for developing novel genetic tools for engineering phage-resistant bacteria of industrial importance.
Many sequenced bacterial genomes, including those of pathogenic bacteria, contain prophages. Some prophages encode defense systems that protect their bacterial host against heterotypic viral attack. Understanding the mechanisms undergirding these defense systems is crucial to appreciate the scope of bacterial immunity against viral infections and will be critical for better implementation of phage therapy that would require evasion of these defenses. Furthermore, such knowledge of prophage-encoded defense mechanisms may be useful for developing novel genetic tools for engineering phage-resistant bacteria of industrial importance., A diverse set of prophage-mediated mechanisms protecting bacterial hosts from infection has been recently uncovered within cluster N mycobacteriophages isolated on the host, Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155. In that context, we unveil a novel defense mechanism in cluster N prophage Butters. By using bioinformatics analyses, phage plating efficiency experiments, microscopy, and immunoprecipitation assays, we show that Butters genes located in the central region of the genome play a key role in the defense against heterotypic viral attack. Our study suggests that a two-component system, articulated by interactions between protein products of genes 30 and 31, confers defense against heterotypic phage infection by PurpleHaze (cluster A/subcluster A3) or Alma (cluster A/subcluster A9) but is insufficient to confer defense against attack by the heterotypic phage Island3 (cluster I/subcluster I1). Therefore, based on heterotypic phage plating efficiencies on the Butters lysogen, additional prophage genes required for defense are implicated and further show specificity of prophage-encoded defense systems., IMPORTANCE Many sequenced bacterial genomes, including those of pathogenic bacteria, contain prophages. Some prophages encode defense systems that protect their bacterial host against heterotypic viral attack. Understanding the mechanisms undergirding these defense systems is crucial to appreciate the scope of bacterial immunity against viral infections and will be critical for better implementation of phage therapy that would require evasion of these defenses. Furthermore, such knowledge of prophage-encoded defense mechanisms may be useful for developing novel genetic tools for engineering phage-resistant bacteria of industrial importance.
 
Sensor: Unknown
 
Activator: Unknown
 
Effector: Unknown
 
PFAM:
 
contributors:
 
- Helena Shomar
 
- Marie Guillaume
 
relevantAbstracts:
 
- doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00534-20
 
---
---
# Butters_gp30_gp31
# Butters_gp30_gp31
## To do
## Description
 
The anti-phage defense system Butters_gp30_gp31 is encoded in the genomes of Actinobacteria, including in prophages.
 
It was experimentally validated in the host _Mycobacterium smegmatis_, and displayed resistance against phages PurpleHaze and Alma.
 
 
## Molecular mechanism
 
To our knowledge the mechanism of action remains unknown.
 
However the proteins of this system are predicted as a cytoplasmic protein (gp30) and a 4-pass transmembrane protein (gp31). The proposed mechanism of action is hypothesized to ressemble the RexA/B system of coliphage Lambda, where activation of gp30 by phage infection stimulates the ion channel gp31 which causes membrane depolarization and loss of intracellular ATP, which in turn, causes abortive infection.
 
 
## Example of genomic structure
 
 
TODO
 
 
## Distribution of the system among prokaryotes
 
 
TODO
## Structure
## Structure
@@ -31,5+55,5 @@
@@ -31,5+55,5 @@
::
::
## Experimental validation
## Experimental validation
<mermaid>
<mermaid>
graph LR;
graph LR;
Mageeney_2020[<a href='https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00534-20'>Mageeney et al., 2020</a>] --> Origin_0
Mageeney_2020[<a href='https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00534-20'>Mageeney et al., 2020</a>] --> Origin_0
Origin_0[Mycobacterium phage Butters
Origin_0[Mycobacterium phage Butters
<a href='https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/YP_007869841.1'>YP_007869841.1</a>, <a href='https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/YP_007869842.1'>YP_007869842.1</a>] --> Expressed_0[Mycobacterium smegmatis]
<a href='https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/YP_007869841.1'>YP_007869841.1</a>, <a href='https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/YP_007869842.1'>YP_007869842.1</a>] --> Expressed_0[Mycobacterium smegmatis]
Expressed_0[Mycobacterium smegmatis] ----> PurpleHazeandAlma
Expressed_0[Mycobacterium smegmatis] ----> PurpleHaze
 
Expressed_0[Mycobacterium smegmatis] ----> Alma
subgraph Title1[Reference]
subgraph Title1[Reference]
Mageeney_2020
Mageeney_2020
end
end
@@ -47,18 +72,11 @@ end
@@ -47,18 +72,11 @@ end
Expressed_0
Expressed_0
end
end
subgraph Title4[Phage infected]
subgraph Title4[Phage infected]
PurpleHazeandAlma
PurpleHaze
 
Alma
end
end
style Title1 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title1 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title2 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title2 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title3 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title3 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title4 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
style Title4 fill:none,stroke:none,stroke-width:none
</mermaid>
</mermaid>
## Relevant abstract
::relevant-abstracts
---
items:
- doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00534-20
---
::
Loading